Guitar Tabs | Updates | News | Reviews | Interviews | Columns | Lessons | Community | Forums | Contests | UG.TV | My Profile
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - Over 200,000 guitar, bass, guitar pro and power tabs. Guitar community.
User comments for stonyman65's profile
Sign-in or register NOW!

stonyman65

stonyman65's Profile Comments

Comments: 4, viewing 1 - 4

stonyman65a wrote on Apr 30th, 2009 1:21am

Once again... I was reviewing MY Jem555 which had serious flaws. I've played others that where not nearly as bad. It was not a hit on the 555 line by itself but a hit on the individual guitar I own.

by the way - it's a JEM not a Gem

quote

LJHarris wrote on Feb 17th, 2009 9:23am

2/10 for a gem555??!! I have a gem555 the pick-ups are hot! & and its build quality... perhaps there are some minor flaws i.e. the tremolo system not as great as higher end models, but I think its an insult to Steve himself giving his Gem a rating such as yours... shame on you!

quote

stonyman65a wrote on Mar 1st, 2008 1:28pm

Yes, the Jem was 10 years old when I bought it. The person who had it before me did not take care of it. After nearly 2 yeras of suffering with it, I replaced the body with an RG470FM body and a Schaller floyd Rose from Warmoth. No problems now. And for your information, I have been playing for over 6 years and have built 3 guitars - I damn shure know what I am talking about.

quote

Tartan_nick wrote on Dec 23rd, 2007 7:24am

The jem you have is either fake, ten years old or broken or you just dont know how to use a guitar or how to rate one.

No guitar should ever get a 1/10 on reliability unless it actually breaks as you pick it up.

I find everything you said in that review heavily negatively biast etc etc.

quote

Post your comment :
Expand

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

DMCA

Ultimate-Guitar.Com ©