mamosa

Subscribe!
Contacting mamosa
Send message Forward
Add to friends Favorites
Add to group Block user
 Who gave a Kudo :
sglover34479 (2)
Thursday, October 01, 2009

Al Sharpton

Current mood: angry

Views: 396
Comments: 1
Here it is, guys. The long-awaited Sharpton blog.

Many of you have heard of Al Sharpton. But for those that have not, I’ll give you a little background information.

Al Sharpton is a 54 (55 on Oct. 3) year old black male who leeches off of society, “discovers” issues present in America (by which I mean creates problems where there are none), lies, discriminates, cheats, steals, has caused the death of numerous amounts of people, as well as prolonging racism in America.

What’s more, I’ll actually prove all of this, as well as adding my own editorial and views.

Al Sharpton makes his living by convincing people to give him money. He makes a comfortable living by convincing others the money will be well used. Also, there is some suspicion that the organization he created—the National Action Network—may actually be something he uses to launder money. He takes people’s money and does nothing good with it (I’ll explain this later, in the opinion section). He also, as many of you may not know, accepts donations to NOT boycott or raise hell about certain things. Anheuser Busch, for one, has donated thousands to avoid Sharpton’s allegations. If he was a real activist, he’d raise the issues and mere money would not stop him from making it right.

Al Sharpton also lies in order to get what he wants, and then lies or cheats his way out of trouble. There was a case in 1987, when a girl (black of course) was discovered covered in shit with racial slurs written on her body. She alleged that 6 white men, including a few cops, raped her. Sharpton, of course, supported her in her claims, and brought forward a witness, who was found to have been lying and claimed to have been “encouraged” to tell his story by Sharpton. After looking at medical records, as well as looking at police records, and listening to all the testimony, the grand jury found that Tawana Brawley had made up her story and done everything to herself, including smearing shit on herself. She had not been raped, as the medical records showed that the vaginal area was undisturbed and there were no signs of her having been in a scuffle, other than her ripped clothing.

Sharpton then called the prosecutor a racist and a rapist, and accused him of being one of the men who raped her. He was sued and found guilty of slander. He had to pay $345,000 in damages, but refused to pay because “I disagreed with the grand jury on Brawley. I believed there was enough evidence to go to trial. Grand jury said there wasn’t. Okay, fine. Do I have a right to disagree with the grand jury? Many Americans believe O.J. Simpson was guilty. A jury said he wasn’t. So I have as much right to question a jury as they do. Does it make somebody a racist? No! They just disagreed with the jury. So did I." However, this statement makes little sense, as OJ Simpson followed the verdict. He’s saying the law is the law, and people are allowed to disagree. But are people allowed to violate the ruling of the courts? No.

Al Sharpton is also a racist and a homophobe, despite his claims that he supports gays. He has been quoted on more than one occasion using unacceptable words for gays. One such quote is: “White folks was [sic] in caves while we was building empires.... We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”

He is also anti-semitic and anti-white and has caused people’s deaths. These are quite connected. There are two such events that transpired that I will note here, many more I will not.

In the mid 90s, there was a white, Jewish owned store called Freddie’s. The owner, a dude named Fred, was asked by his landlord (a black Pentecostal church lol) to evict Fred’s subtenant, a black-owned store. He did, and Sharpton said, “We will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business.”

Now, apart from him having used the word white multiple times in his speech as a bad thing and apart from him calling a legal tenant—who was the landlord in this case—an “interloper”, he called for action against a white for no reason. How is it racism against blacks if a black church is trying to evict a black person? I don’t know, but maybe Al Sharpton knows better than I do. After all, he did notice this GLARINGLY OBVIOUS bit of racism. (Note: the eviction wasn’t to expand his business.)

Now, rather than harassing Fred like he does to most others, he actually started riots. And more than that, he told his followers they should get rid of the interloper’s business. Hmm… a call to arms, perhaps?

A day after his rousing speech, one of Al’s closest friends/followers/slaves went into Freddie’s with a few tanks of gasoline and a gun. He shot a few people, killing them instantly, lit the place on fire, and then shot himself.

Now, to be fair, there is absolutely no concrete proof that Al Sharpton told this man to do what he did. But let’s look at it logically:

1.     Al Sharpton is a radical who has caused riots and demanded penalties before.

2.     He has caused much trouble.

3.     He has a radical following.

4.     He’s an idiot.

5.     He hates Jews and whites.

6.     He had just been calling for actions to be taken against Freddie’s.

7.     One of his sycophants/confidants/followers/whatever did it.

Now, even if you do not think Sharpton directly spoke to his follower and ordered him to commit those murders, he still caused them by inciting this man with his talk of action and his riots. So whether it was direct or indirect only matters in terms of sentencing. Al Sharpton caused the deaths of almost ten people in this one incident.

The next incident is also quite a bad one. On August 19, 1991, a Jew was driving an right behind him was an unmarked cop car. The two cars went through an intersection and the Jewish driver was T-boned by another car. (Witnesses couldn’t agree whether the light was yellow or red) Unfortunately, a 7 year old boy named Gavin Cato and his cousin Angela were hit. Gavin lay pinned under the car, and he was dead. His cousin was also hurt. The policeman called for an ambulance, and a PRIVATE ambulance came and was instructed by the cop to take the Jew away because he was worried about him (he was uninjured). Very soon after, the city ambulance arrived to take away the Catos. Gavin was dead; Angela survived. This all is very upsetting, but what does this have to do with Al Sharpton?

Well, Sharpton began claiming that the private ambulance refused to treat Cato, which caused his death. Now, other than that being patently untrue, it was also inflammatory. Blacks rioted for days, looting stores, destroying others, beating Jews (even killing several, one of which was visiting from Australia) all the while shouting things like, “KILL THE JEW!” Sharpton himself marched, being seen shouting, “If the Jews want to get it on, tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house." He also, as a way of inciting the people called the Jews, “Diamond merchants” and chanted during the march, “Whose streets? Our streets! No justice, no peace!”

His “activists” were nothing more than petty criminals using this death to their advantage. They stole, assaulted, and ruined people’s lives, all in the name of “justice”. I call bullshit. They’re like him, using unfortunate circumstances to further themselves. He doesn’t help, he hurts. Treating the word “lynch” as a racist word, defending a large minority while insulting other minorities, etc. is not a good thing. It’s the mark of a selfish asshole doing what he can to make his name known, and to increase his fortune.

And anyone caught telling him off is labeled a racist, rather than someone who cuts through bullshit. He needs to be in jail. Why isn’t he? Why has he gotten off so lightly for the countless smear campaigns, tax evasion attempts, and money laundering, etc. he has done? Because if he was arrested, the shit would hit the fan. The justice system can’t do its job correctly because he has taken control of too many minds.

Please post comments.

6:54 pm - 1 comments - 2 Kudos - Report!
Comments
sglover34479 wrote on Oct 15th, 2009 2:29pm

Very informative. I didn't know any of this, but it makes sense and google doesn't do much but agree with it lol. Thanks :)

quote

Post your comment
Expand