justlivin

justlivin's Profile Comments

Comments: 11, viewing 1 - 11

MrsDana.33 wrote on Feb 24th, 2012 12:41am

You can participate with us in the blog love,
and solicit opinions on topics relevant fields of romance and happy of your presence with us on the following link

www.lovers-blog.com

quote

whatadrag wrote on Sep 30th, 2009 6:51pm

justlivin wrote on Jul 16th, 2009 at 9:38am :
Hey...

mind sharing your setting in the B-52 Thread to help get it going?

http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/forum/showthread.ph p?t=966788&page=24&pp=20


Yeah sure thing man, give me a day or two and I'll post some:)

quote

HouseBoy83 wrote on Sep 10th, 2009 3:04pm

justlivin wrote on Sep 8th, 2009 at 6:51pm :
thank you. since you have both... I think you can give a more honest opinion than those that don't.


the 5150 II has a more RAW and open tone to it it then the 6262. the 6262 has a more smoother tone to it..which i like. the II is alot smoother then the original 5150s(which are a bit harsh in tone IMO). the only i wish the 6262 had was a res control(that adjusts the low/mid freq like the 5150/5150 IIs have) the presence controls adjust the high/mid freqs). but not having a res control on the 6260/6262 amps is really not that big of deal. damn good sounding amp!

quote

HouseBoy83 wrote on Sep 7th, 2009 12:06pm

justlivin wrote on Sep 4th, 2009 at 7:40pm :
Which do you prefer in all honestly, price aside. Your Bugera, or your modded 5150II?


well to be honest..i do love my 5150 II, but at times i do enjoy cranking up my 6262. the Bugera has WAY better cleans then the 5150 II

quote

bac738 wrote on Sep 4th, 2009 7:21pm

PANDA!

quote

HouseBoy83 wrote on Sep 4th, 2009 5:29pm

Hey man, thanks for the request
whats up?

quote

whatadrag wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 6:51am

justlivin wrote on Jun 4th, 2009 at 9:08am :


not a whole lot actually.
i love seeing people using the At series so i usually add them. =]

also, i noticed you have a tempest hellraiser,
which i don't see alot of.

how are you liking it?


yeah man the AT series is probably the best budget amp for our style..

the tempest hellraiser.... I actually had to order it directly from the factory. No place I've ever seen keeps them in stock. I love the look of it, and especially where the toggle switch is(very easy to use during play), but the neck on it is difficult to reach most frets above the 12th. Bit of a problem since I'm a lead player...

Even so, its a beautiful looking, feeling, and playing guitar. I'd recommend it to a Rhythm player though, as for lead i would go for the C-1

quote

whatadrag wrote on Jun 4th, 2009 5:17am

whats up dude?

quote

Carrot wrote on Apr 3rd, 2009 10:48pm

justlivin wrote on Apr 3rd, 2009 at 7:16pm :


so you're saying MH??


yeah with a EMG 60 in the neck

quote

Carrot wrote on Mar 30th, 2009 11:28pm

justlivin wrote on Mar 30th, 2009 at 8:58pm :


which of your guitars do you prefer?
which works better for what style?
and which is more versatile period?
better(lower) action?
comfort?

i ask because im torn between the two guitars and would like you opinion seeing as you own both...


i prefer my MH400NT tbh
it play a lot of metal on it but it can play rock, blues and ive played funk on it too
i can get a low action on both of them tbh
the only thing i would say is swap the 85 out of the MH 400 NT neck and put a EMG 60 in it, much better cleans

quote

Carrot wrote on Mar 30th, 2009 11:27am

hey
ask away bout my guitars

quote

Post your comment :
Expand