Guitar Tabs | Updates | News | Reviews | Interviews | Columns | Lessons | Community | Forums | Contests | UG.TV | My Profile
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - Over 200,000 guitar, bass, guitar pro and power tabs. Guitar community.
belavista man's blogs, last updated : August 15, 2009
Sign-in or register NOW!

belavista man

Subscribe!
Contacting belavista man
Send message Forward
Add to friends Favorites
Add to group Block user
 Blog archive :

First | Last

Next 10

Previous 10

Advanced view
from date
to date
on date
Friday, August 14, 2009

Where've All The Good People Gone?

Current mood: worried

 It may just be me but why, in fairly recent years, have all the good people been disappearing? I know I've been born into an era that wasn't blessed with Jimi Hendrix, John Lennon, Buddy Holly, Keith Moon etc.. But we still had a fair few who stuck it out and are/were still around..

 I've just heard of the death of Les Paul and it's really brought home the fact that we're losing whatever living idols and legends we actually had the fortune to live in the same time-space as. I mean, Les is gone. Michael Jackson, Mitch Mitchel, James Brown, all the great players and performers of our time seem to be dropping within the last few years.

It's quite scary.

 Soon, we're only going to be left with a handful of people who we can actually aspire to. We still got David Bowie, Sting, Pete Townshend, Paul McCartney etc.. But they're not gonna be around forever. Who will our kids aspire to be like then? I honestly can't think of anybody quite worthy enough.

Soon music will be dead. Brace yourself for a boring musical press and charts thereafter people.
2:21 am - 1 comments - 0 Kudos
Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Gigography

Current mood: amused

I've decided; I'm gonna say a little about most of the gigs I've done... Because I'm bored lol.
 
22/12/2007 - The Attic, Accrington, with 'Le Crab':
I'll remember this place because it was such a small venue. A big place in Accrington for gigs, apparently though. I fluffed the solo in One Way or Another though, which I beat myself up about. Mine and Anne's song, Bimbo, went well though. It seemed to go down well with the audience too. Benn turned up a bit later too, wanting to play So Long November, but he was a little late haha.
 
13/03/2008 - The White Bull, Blackburn, with 'Le Crab' and 'sCoda':
This was interesting.. The first band, Le Crab, was fun. I fluffed the solo in One Way or Another (again), and the whole band cocked up on I Love Rock 'n' Roll/We Will Rock You. We generally enjoyed it though. It was a battle of the bands, and we just lost to Velvet Crush. They deserved to win in the end though.
 
06/06/2008 - The Cellar Bar, Blackburn, with 'Le Crab':
Final and best Le Crab gig. We played near all the songs perfect and the new song, Don't Stop, went down a storm. It's a shame that the rest of our gigs didn't go as well. As far as I know, everyone else's bands played well too. Tony's band was the best though, hands down.
 
22/06/2008 - Franky's Bar, Darwen, with the 'Dogs of Two Heads':
I liked this gig. The opener, Pictures of Matchstickmen, was one of the best songs we had played together. We then played Rockin' All Over the World and finished with a blues jam, which was pretty awful. All in all, I think we played well together. Greg wasn't so fortunate later on when he got into a bit of a punch-up around the corner from the bar - hurt his 'walking' hand in the process lol. The bar itself is nice but there's alot nicer places than it, trust me...
 
24/08/2008 - Private wedding gig (Darwen Golf Club), with Greg and Sam:
We only played the one song, by request of the bride. The rest of the night was spent drinking and having a laugh, though I spilt my beer on Sam's Dad. That was embarrasing...
 
 
I got more to fill in, I just can't be bothered yet lol, so watch this space...
 
Anthony
2:35 pm - 1 comments - 1 Kudos
Friday, September 12, 2008

I Officially Hate Scooter!

Current mood: amused

Scooter are the stupidest foreign bast*rds ever. It's official lol. If the high pitched vocals on shit like Jumping All Over The World (and then off a cliff) wasn't bad enough, they've finished off what was left in the life of one of Quo's greatest hits. Whatever You Want was great up untill Scooter got thier mits on it.
 
The only good thing that came from that song was the singer randomly shouting "Quo!" every now and then for no clear reason. Makes me laugh...
 
What's your opinion? Disagree and feel the wrath of many Quo fans... lol.
 
Belavista Man
11:41 am - 2 comments - 0 Kudos
Friday, February 29, 2008

Death

Current mood: melancholy

This is more of a personal blog than anything. If I neglect my UG profile over the next few days, this is why...
 
My grandfather, Lawrence Bentley, passed away today (at around 7:30 PM.). If anything, this blog may lay tribute to him, if anything.
 
Sorry if this has been a waste of time for some, but it's a personal thing, and I want people to repect that.
 
Anthony
10:31 am - 3 comments - 2 Kudos
Monday, February 11, 2008

Radio 1 Classic Interviews: Jimi Hendrix

Current mood: calm

I found this book with cool interviews in... here's the main one that struck me. Have a look, guys! You'll probably find it interesting!

SCENE AND HEARD, Radio 1's rock magazine programme, had a special edition in August 1970 celebrating the Isle of Wight Festival. All the line-up were included in the programme, apart from Jimi Hendrix. Producer Jeff Griffin was determined to speak to Hendrix, who eventually agreed to talk to one of the programme's contributors, Keith Altham.

 Keith spoke to Hendrix in a hotel in London's Park Lane on 12 September. Jimi's bassist, Billy Cox, had just flown back to the States with drug problems.

 'Jimi was sprawled on a double bed, with my tape recorder balanced on the other end,' recalls Altham. 'I think he may have been drinking, but there was no evidence of the drugs that everyone talks about in connection with Hendrix. Although it was two days before his death, he didn't strike me as being particularly down or depressed in any way.

 'He could turn on this amazing exhibitionism on stage, but off stage he was extremely shy and introverted, so he was never especially lively in an interview situation. He was extraordinarily popular at the time, especially in America, but he was still more famous for his wild antics on stage than for his musicianship. I think he'd reached the stage where he'd made anough money, and now he wanted to push the barriers back further and extend himself a bit further. In fact I found him in fairly optimistic mood, with all kinda or plans for the future.

 Very little of this interview has ever been broadcast, simply because of the way Hendrix talks in it, often mumbling and laughing. He was found dead two days after it was recorded.

 

ALTHAM: Everybody, subsequent to the Isle of White Festival, has been talking about the new subdued, mature Jimi Hendrix. I wonder if you could tell us why this is, and where it started from.

HENDRIX: This is a period when I stop talking so much, because I'm going through certain things here and there. Whatever. I guess I just got very quiet for a while. I just do gigs, and stay down. I try to stay away, you know. Because I was changing, and getting into heavier music. It was getting unbearable with three pieces [in the band], you know. I always wanted to expand on all this. But I think I'll go back to three pieces again now. And get another bass player. And I'll probably be loud again. [LAUGHS]

ALTHAM: It does appear that the days of the baubles and bangles and the freaky hairstyle have disappeared. Are you not worried that maybe your quieter approach may lose a little of the mystique that there was with Jimi Hendrix which attracted people to begin with?

HENDRIX: You see, everybody goes through those stages. But I don't know, I just did that because I felt like I was being too loud. Because my nature changes, you know.

ALTHAM: You were quoted in one paper as saying you never wanted to be a visual thing.

HENDRIX: What I wanted to be basically - this is only hyped up on all the visual thing - I wanted to be listened to. I don't know if they were [listening] or not, though. After a while, I started getting aware too much of what was going down. That started to bring me down a little bit, so I just started cutting my hair, and start the rings disappearing one by one.

ALTHAM: Are you in fact saying that that kind of freak thing was really a publicity hype?

HENDRIX: No. No, all they did is let me do what I really wanted to do, my own kind of scenes. Like, one time I said, 'Maybe I should burn a guitar tonight, I really feel low.' Or, 'Maybe I should smash a guitar', or something like that. All they said, 'Yeah, yeah', and I said, 'Do you really think I should?' They said, 'Yeah, that would be cool', so I said, 'OK'. So I just has to work up anough anger as to where I could do it. But I didn't take too much of the hype scene and all that, because I dug wearing all those different things. It was fun. And I still do, but I don't see where many other people are doing it, so it gives me a dumb or stupid tendency to hold back on my own desires and so forth.

ALTHAM: So the anger, maybe, has dispersed a little bit.

HENDRIX: I didn't know it was anger until they told me that it was, you know, like with destruction and all that. I believe everybody should have a room where they get rid of all their... releases, where they can do all their releases. So me room was on stage.

ALTHAM: What is going to happen now? You apparantly said after the Isle of White festival that you were going to do less personal appearances.

HENDRIX: I think it can't work if we did less personal appearances. We're trying to get a tour in England together now. That's definitely going to call for another bass player.

ALTHAM: Would it be practical for you to get together maybe an organist, or a vocalist, so that you can step back as a guitarist?

HENDRIX: That's exactly what I want to do, actually. All I'll do is probably get two guitarists, counting myself, an organist and a singer. And drums, quite naturally, and bass. If I can get something like that, that would be out of sight.

ALTHAM: I remember talking to Alvin Lee of Ten Years After, and he said of you that you'd never really been truely appreciated or analysed as a song-writer. Do you feel that maybe your image got in the way of that? Do you feel that you've never truly been criticised as a songwriter?

HENDRIX: Well, probably that was good thing, because I'm still trying to get that together. All I write is just what I feel, that's all. I don't really round it off too good, I keep it almost naked. The words are so blank and everything, they probably didn't want to get into that. When we go to play, you flick it around, you flash it around, but they don't see nothing but what their eyes see, you know, forget about their ears/ I hate to be in one corner, I hate to be put as only a guitar player, or only as a songwriter, only as a tap-dancer or something. I like to fool around.

ALTHAM: Is it important for you to achieve recognition as a songwriter?

HENDRIX: I guess it would be if I wanted to lay back and predominantly write songs, when I can't go on stage anymore.

ALTHAM: You were quoted in one paper as saying you didn't really care what you did, as long as you 'turn people on'. What do you want to turn people on to, apart from your music? Is there any moral or political intent in the things you want to write?

HENDRIX: I like for them to get easier in the mind a little bit, because there's too many heavy songs out nowadays. Music is getting too heavy, almost to the state of unbearable. I have this thing, 'When things get too heavy, just call me helium, the lightest gas known to man.' [LAUGHS]

ALTHAM: So where are your inspirations for songs coming from at the present time? Where are you turning for your directions as a writer?

HENDRIX: Right from my recent experiences. What I try to do is look at the totality of that, and give them the other half. First of all you have the experience, then you have the second half, the solution to whatever it might be, which is the use of it all. I was just trying to go through a lot of changes, so I could write the nice part about them, you know? But right now, it's taken a while.

ALTHAM: You've been quoted as saying in the past that we're now at an end of something in music, and the next stage of popular music will change the world. Do you really believe that, or do you think that music is a reflection of the world?

HENDRIX: It's always a reflection, but a reflection of the world is, like, blues. That's where that part of music is at. But then you get this other kind of music that's trying to come around - it's not sunshine music necessarily, but it's like an easier type of thing, with more meaning to it. You're not going to be singing about love all the time in order to give love to the people. I was just feeling all nice and enthusiastic when I said that. I can't go back on what I said, because that's a nice thought.

ALTHAM: Do you want to change the world?

HENDRIX: I'd like to take part in a change in reality, probably. not the way to handle it, necessarily, but the was to get along better, as it were. Old and young don't clash so much together.

ALTHAM: What are the things you would like to see change?

HENDRIX: I don't know. More colour in the streets, probably. [LAUGHS] I really don't know. Whatever happens, it should have a chance to be brought into the open. If there's a new idea, a new invention, or a new gas, or a new whatever, it should be brought at least into the open, and be respected as being new, and probably a decent change that would help the human race, instead of keeping carrying the same old burdens around with them. You have to have your long hair and talk a certain way in order to be with them. In order to be the other, you have to have your hair short and wear ties. So we're trying to make a third world happen, you know what I mean.

ALTHAM: I think certain people think of your music as angry music, raging against established principles.

HENDRIX: It's raging against it. If it was up to me there wouldn't be any such thing as establishment. Reality is each persons way of thinking, and the establishment grabs a big piece of that, and the Church of England and so forth. But it's the blues, that's what I'm singing about, today's blues.

ALTHAM: Do you have any politics, in fact?

HENDRIX: Not really. I was getting ready to get into all that, but everybody goes through those stages too. It all comes out in the music, most of the time. We had this one song called 'Straight Ahead', and it says 'Power to the people, freedom to the soul, pass it on the yound and old. We don't give a damn if your hair is short or long, communication's coming on strong.'

ALTHAM: When you look back on things like 'Hey Joe' not, how do you feel about those musically?

HENDRIX: I think they're alright, I guess. I don't have anything to regret at all in the past. Except that I might have unintentionally hurt someone else, or something. And the music, I think that they're all on a kind of downbeat. I just look at them as changes.

ALTHAM: It has been said of you, that you invented psychedelic music...

HENDRIX: [LAUGHS] A mad scientist!

ALTHAM: ...Do you think that's fair? Do you think of yourself as a psychedelic writer?

HENDRIX: I think it's more that than anything else. I'm trying to get more into other things. I don't know what the word means, really. What is it? You say one thing and mean another? Or you can get about three different meanings out of one thing? Is that where it's at?

ALTHAM: I think psychedelic to most people has connotations of LSD.

HENDRIX: You mean strictly LSD, or that type or consciousness?

ALTHAM: ...with dreams...

HENDIX: Right. You have to get a little bit of a dream on, so you can hear it over again, because it might come in a different mood. Different dreams come from different moods.

ALTHAM: You've talked quite a bit about audio-visual importance, the importance or having a film with your music. Are you thinking in terms of the days when we can fit a cassette into the side of our television and play music and film together?

HENDRIX: A lot of people are making more money then they ever have nowadays, like when they get a flat they find themselves with an extra room. So this whole room can be a total audio-visual environment, where you just lay back and the whole thing just blossoms out, with this colour and sound type of scene. You can go in here and you can just jingle out your nerves or something. That goes with a cassette, yeah. You put in your favourite star, and all of a sudden, the music and the visual scene comes in. Plus on stage, if we ever did any more stage things with this new band, it would definately have to be audio-visual. There would probably only be about 5000 people at the performance. Because we'd have this geodesic dome. It would probably take about three days to set the whole thing up. Then you get a performance under that for the next three days. And just handfuls of people coming in. I think that would be dynamite, because everybody would get more of an effect from it. Instead of putting a big black screen behind you.

ALTHAM: What about the subject of festivals? Do you think the Isle of White is, as some people have said, the last big festival?

HENDRIX: I don't know why they're always trying to kill the festivals really. It was great. People milling out, digging each other, so many mixtures of different countries. The only hostility you're going to get from festivals is not from the people themselves, but from the other people who can't understand the idea of mixing so many different people together, under the name of music, peace and love. Because this is a completely different from the World War II set-up. In World War II, all these countries were completely against each other. Now we're getting them all together through the idea of music.

ALTHAM: Do you feel personally that you've got enough money now, without necessarily making more money as a professional entertainer?

HENDRIX: I don't think so, not in the way I'd like to live - I want to get up in the morning and roll out of bed into an indoor swimming pool. Then swim to the breakfast table, come up for air and maybe get a drink of orange juice. And just flop over from the chair into the swimming pool and swim into the bathroom.

ALTHAM: You don't want to live just comfortably, you want to live luxuriously.

HENDRIX: No. Is that luxurious? I was thinking about a tent, baby, overhanging a mountain stream. [LAUGHS]

ALTHAM: Now Billy Cox [Jimi Hendrix Experience member] has split. So whatever happens, you've got to find a new bass player. Do you intend to form another small unit, or are you hoping to get something bigger together?

HENDRIX: I don't know. I think I'll get another small one together. It's really hard to decide. I'd like to have both if I could. And use one for touring, and then sometimes I could do a tour with the big one, or whatever. But it's really hard to know what people want around here sometimes. All I'm going to do is I'm just going to do what I feel, but right now I can't feel anything. There's a few things since this happened, so I just have to lay back and think about it all.

ALTHAM: Do you feel any kind of compulsion to prove yourself as 'King Guitar', which is the label that people have slapped on you?

HENDRIX: I don't know. I was always just playing lous, that's the only difference. No, I don't even let that bother me. Because they say a lot of things about people that, if they let it bother them, they wouldn't even be around today. 'King Guitar'? No, that's a bit heavy.

10:51 am - 1 comments - 0 Kudos
Sunday, January 13, 2008

Over-amplification!

Current mood: hungry

 For those who actually look on my blogs regurlarly, they might have noticed that I post one per month (roughly), and I'm stuck for what to write in my blog this month. Alot has happened since Christmas; I'm now playing bass in Amplify This! being one of them.

 I've put a deposit on a new amp too; a HiWatt MaxWatt. It's a nice little machine. Tried one at college. Sounds pretty gd with my TC200B, I must admit. I suppose that brings me onto something; Amplifiers. I was talking to my tutor at college about this...

 You see all these bands on stage with about 4 rigs to a guitarist - 2 to a bassist. Correct me if I'm wrong about this, but I've noticed something very ironic about these amps; they seem to be miked up.

 If you've got something like 10 rigs on stage, shouldn't you have enough power to fill the room with sound? If not, then why have so many rigs on stage when you could just have one rig to a player and mic THAT up? Is it all to do with the image? The ego? I don't get it...

 My tutor mentioned that his son has a Metallica DVD, and on that, they play on stage with NO amps, just them and their instruments (the amps are under the stage, apparantly), and he said that it looked a hell of alot better than having a hundred amps cluttering the stage up.

 I saw a Gary Moore DVD the other day - a montreal one, I think - and he only had 2 rigs, and the bassist had one. It's not quite the same thing, but Gary Moore creates this mind blowing sound with only that many rigs/cabs - why do people have to use twice as many just to equal it?

 It just seems so irnoic to me... I dunno... Anyway, leave some comments on your oppinion. Gives me something to do haha.
5:52 pm - 0 comments - 0 Kudos
Sunday, December 02, 2007

Attack of the Clones!!!

Current mood: calm

Right, I know that I've moaned about new and old bands being stereo-typed and I know that I've gone on about how some of the greatest bands have degraded themselves, so this time I'm gonna complain about...
 
"New" bands deliberately following in the footsteps of other bands (e.i. copying other bands).
 
 Every day I come across more and more bands that sound almost identical to other bands; bands that built their originality from scratch... I was watching one of the most aweful shows on Earth last night (The X Factor) and there was a girl-group on there called Hope (kinda ironic since they got voted out). They sounded as if they were just trying to be like the Spice Girls or Girls Aloud (and failing badly). Even the judges keep saying that "they want to find the next Spice Girls".
 
 I think all these pop bands are aweful, to be honest, but pop bands who copy other pop bands? They're horrific... People want NEW music, not cheap cover-bands. *cough* WESTLIFE!*cough*. The best thing about that show last night was Duran Duran. I'm not a huge fan of Duran Duran, but they were amazing compared to the rest of the crap that was performing on the stage.
 
 There were a few artists on there that were alright, but they're besides the point. Bands like these keep cropping up all over the place. Another example... take a look at Panic! At The Disco (i've used them as examples so much, they're almost a cliche). If they arn't clinging on to whatever Fall Out Boy established for themselves, then I don't know what they're doing. The vocals sound the same, some of the guitar parts sound the same... the only thing that's different is that Panic! use a few more dirty words.
 
"OMG! What did they say?! They can't say that!!!" *giggle giggle giggle*
 
Whatever! Childish pigs... anyway, do you see what I mean? It's like band after band of clones! It's begining to sh*t me up! :haha:
 
I can't be bothered writing any more on this... bands are gonna keep coming and going... there's only so much you can do with what you got, I suppose. Leave me some comments on what YOU think.
 
"Gimme all your comments, all of your Kudos too!" :haha:
 
luv.luv.luv.
Anthony
3:40 pm - 2 comments - 2 Kudos
Tuesday, November 20, 2007

There's no such thing as "emo" music!

Current mood: content

 I'm not one for criticizing other people's musical tastes/genres, but I seriously don't think there's a genre of music called "emo". For the past few years now, there's been this uproar evolution of punk music, known only as "emo", which is stupid when you think about it. Personally, I've always thought that the bands don't make themselves this label of "emo". I've always thought that it's the fans of those bands that give them that persona.

 

 I read on Ultimate Guitar once that Gerard Way refuses to allow his band to be known as an emo group, which is fair enough. It's not his fault, after all. I read another article in Kerrang! ages ago about a girl who claimed that "MCR Saved My Life". That's a prime example of what I'm moaning on about. How can a band save your life? It's not like they ran into a burning building to save her... Anyway, I'm losing track of my point.

 

 A band is never really emo, are they? Sure, they can be depressed/depressing, but so was Kurt Cobbain, he wasn't classed as emo and never will be classed as emo. He will always be classed by many (but not by me personally) as a rock god who dressed and acted like an everyday American citizen.

 

 That brings me onto another thing; Dress. I like alot of the dress sense that comes with "Emo" (I wear black all the time and I won't wear anything other than Converse - I'll never proudly wear guy-liner though...), but how can your dress sense be set into a class of fashion that ultimatly decides your taste in music? Is it because your favourite band dresses like that or because you want to make a statement? Probaby both...

 

 With punk, most people dressed the way that they did because they wanted to rebel and make a statement with it. Others just did it because they thought Johnny Rotten (or whoever) was a God. With emo, they dress like they do mostly because they want to copy the band they love so much (sarcasm intended) but when they do it, they emphasise one little thing called 'emotions', and it reflects onto the band(s) that they're following. They may love the band, but they're killing their reputation without even knowing it.

 

 So, I will ask again, do you still think there's a viable reason for creating a new style of music for something that is just Punk but... dressed up? Sure, you may think that MCR or whoever you happen to worship deserve a whole catagory to themselves just because they're gods in your eyes, but they already have a catagory, and it's called pop-punk.

 

That's all the emo is. Dressed up punk, or (as I said) pop-punk for short. I know that an article like this one isn't going to really effect the minds of the masses a great deal, but I just want people to take heade of the fact that emo isn't (and should never be) a style of music. It will only ever be the dress sense that a group of fans have addopted.

 

Do you agree? Do you hate me for this article? Whatever your oppinion/argument, post a comment. It will make interesting reading...

4:20 pm - 12 comments - 8 Kudos
Monday, October 08, 2007

Super-group Stupidity?

Current mood: irate

 I've been wondering lately... Why is it that bands, who establish themselves above thousands of others, always end up ditching the roots of the music that made them famous? I was speaking to someone at college today who actually agreed with me that The Police got worse and worse as thier albums progressed, which is a kind of a rarity... Outlandos D'Amour, Regatta De Blanc and most of Zenyatta Mondatta are based around Reggae/Jazz, which I loved. But thier last two albums (Ghost In The Machine and Synchronicity) changed almost completely and became too "80's" for me to handle. Sure, there were classic tracks on them like Every Little Thing She Does Is Magic, Every Breath You Take and Synchronicity II, but they just arn't Police. I wouldn't mind, but there were almost no traces of the original Police style left when they released Synchronicity...
 I hate it when bands try to addapt after they have established themselves... sure, sometimes it's so that they can evolve with the times or plainly because they want to try something new, but they shouldn't change THAT much.
 The same happened to Status Quo, which is ironic because "Status Quo" means "Stays the same". They had to addapt in the 80's to become more "modern". I hated some of the stuff that was produced in the 80's, but I have often sat through the electronic-sounding drums and over-used keyboards and I often did see the remains of the classic Status Quo style, which is a relief considdering that most bands ditch everything they stood for completely.
 I'll never understand it, I suppose. It's not the fault of the band, but the fault of the fans and/or of the music at the time... Times change that often that a band needs to change with it... it's so sad really...
 
Can no-one make an easier living these days?
7:33 am - 2 comments - 1 Kudos
Friday, September 28, 2007

Narrow minded?

Current mood: curious

Right, I know this is a thing that has been going on for ages now, but I only know a few people on here who have a very open view about music. I like to think of myself as one of them, but that's just me.
 
Most people on here are in two catagories:
1: "That music is OLD therefore IT'S SH*T!"
2: "That music is NEW therefore IT'S SIMPLISTIC (and sh*t)!"
 
That annoys me as much as labeling people because of the music they like. It's so stupid! "Old" music made music what it is today, so people who only like "new" music have to respect that! It's cause and effect, for Godsake! "New" music may be simplistic but that doesn't make it sh*t! You can't group the whole section of "new" music into one bit sh*tty catagory just because people like The Sex Pistols f*cked it up years ago with "punk".
 
The way I see it is that every form of music has it's charms. I love classic rock ("old music" to those ignorant enough) because it's got the theory behind it, it's got the rhythm and that beat that gets your foot tappin. I love everything like that. Reggae, Rock, Blues, (most) Jazz, Swing, anything.
As for today's music, I like that too. I like The Feeling, Snow Patrol, Fall Out Boy... I even love the post-punk, pop-punk and emo stuff like Green Day, Paramore and MCR. Green Day were originally punk, but now they're classed more as Alternative (I think). Thier stuff may still be simplistic and based around a pretty samey chord sequence, but it still has its charms.
That brings me onto another stereotypical piece of shit! Everyone says that Status Quo are boring because "they only play 3 chords"! If you open your ears then you'll find that there are plenty of chords in thier songs! Alot of bands out there play less chords than they do, and they don't get picked on. I wonder why...
It all comes back to 2 groups of narrow minded people who can't seem to accept both sides of the arguement. It's so pathetic, really. Leave comments on here about what you think. It would be even better if you are narrow minded and you have a valid reason for hating the age of music that you hate (and DON'T say "because they can only play the pentatonic scale", because I already know. Some bands can only play that scale, true, but they still have SOME theory behind the rest of the music.)
 
Thanks for reading my rant :haha:
12:27 pm - 6 comments - 9 Kudos
First page | « Previous 10 blogs

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

DMCA

Ultimate-Guitar.Com ©