Guitar Tabs | Updates | News | Reviews | Interviews | Columns | Lessons | Community | Forums | Contests | UG.TV | My Profile
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - Over 200,000 guitar, bass, guitar pro and power tabs. Guitar community.
aznrockerdude's blogs, last updated : August 9, 2009
Sign-in or register NOW!

aznrockerdude

Subscribe!
Contacting aznrockerdude
Send message Forward
Add to friends Favorites
Add to group Block user
 Blog archive :

First | Last

Next 10

Previous 10

Advanced view
from date
to date
on date
Sunday, August 09, 2009

First (unorganized) rant

Current mood: bored

Ever notice how those guitar strings optimized for "drop-tuning" have the three bottom strings thicker than the "standard" set?

For example:
D'addario's Light Top/Heavy Bottom set, tuned to Standard E

Diameter Tension
Item# Note inches mm lbs kg
PL010 E 0.010 0.25 16.2 7.35
PL013 B 0.013 0.33 15.4 6.98
PL017
 G 0.017 0.43 16.6 7.53
NW030 D 0.030 0.76 25.0 11.34
NW042 A 0.042 1.07 26.3 11.93
NW052 E 0.052 1.32 22.0
 9.98

Take a look at how the bottom E actually has less tension compared to the D and A string.
Now, this analysis was done for standard tuning, not drop tuning: since drop tuning requires to down-tune the low E, you'll end up having even less tension there than when you tuned it to standard (obviously). But they also make the D and A string thicker compared to the "standard" set, making the gap between tensions even higher!

A lot of metal guitarists (like me) also prefer to dig on the bottom strings harder, which is also why these strings need fixing (imo). I don't personally mind having the B string looser, as I tend to bend that string often, but I see no benefit in having the low E lacking tension.

/rant
3:13 pm - 2 comments - 0 Kudos

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

DMCA

Ultimate-Guitar.Com ©